Filed by Conrad · Case 26-104594-DO

12d Second Chain Of Custody Supplement Scrape Evidence 2026-05-14

Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce) · Wayne County Circuit Court (Third Judicial Circuit), Hon. Nicole N. Goodson · Filed 2026-05-14

Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).

Loading document…

Filing text (searchable excerpt)

STATE OF MICHIGAN

                IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
                              FAMILY DIVISION, DOMESTIC RELATIONS

 ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS,                                    Case No. 26-104594-DO
   Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
                                                                  Hon. Nicole N. Goodson
 v.

 CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
  Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CHAIN OF CUSTODY SUPPLEMENT:
SHA-256 HASH MANIFEST FOR MAY 14, 2026 SCRAPE EVIDENCE; OPERATIONAL-
   SILENCE OBSERVATION; CROSS-PLATFORM SYNCHRONIZATION FINDING

                                              I. PURPOSE
1. This Second Chain of Custody Supplement is filed in further support of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's
   Emergency Motion for Preservation Order and Order Prohibiting Spoliation of Evidence, filed on May 13,
   2026, and is a continuation of the Chain of Custody Supplement (the "First Supplement") filed
   contemporaneously with that Motion. By Order entered May 14, 2026, this Honorable Court denied the
   emergency framing of that Motion while leaving the Motion alive on the regular docket for hearing on
   ePraecipe. This Second Supplement therefore supports both the preserved evidentiary record and the
   pending Motion as it proceeds on the regular docket.
2. This Second Supplement adds to the chain-of-custody record three additional public-record Twitter
   scrape datasets captured on May 14, 2026 covering the period from May 12, 2026 forward (collectively,
   the "May 14, 2026 Scrape Evidence"). It further reports two observations that follow from comparison of
   the May 14, 2026 Scrape Evidence with the May 12, 2026 Scrape Evidence already on the record: (a)
   the operational silence of the monitored X-network accounts since May 12, 2026, and (b) a cross-
   platform temporal synchronization on May 9, 2026 between an electronic mail message sent to witness
   Ann Helgren and an X-platform reply by the account @spuntpatrol.

                                    II. CAPTURE METHODOLOGY
3. The May 14, 2026 Scrape Evidence datasets were captured on May 14, 2026 between approximately
   22:02 UTC and 22:03 UTC by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Conrad Rockenhaus using the Apify platform's
   apidojo/tweet-scraper actor (https://apify.com), the same actor used for the May 12, 2026 Scrape
   Evidence captures.
4. Three separate queries were submitted to the actor. The first query was a multi-handle date-bounded
   query covering the twelve X account handles preserved in the May 12, 2026 Scrape Evidence
   (adezero,    spuntpatrol,      LeighCheri_,      phatadvert,       AllysonClermont,      4chantress,
   alg0queen, LuceMargarita, blackjakkkk, PunkyHomegirl, picklepickleg, p1ratech) with
   date parameters start: 2026-05-12 and end: 2026-05-15, configured with maxItems: 1000,
   sort order Latest, and language filter English. The second query targeted the conversation tree of the
   May 8, 2026 "Dead Man's Switch" broadcast tweet (conversation identifier 2052837253408280726). The
   third query was an open mentions search targeting replies to @spuntpatrol or @adezero since May
    12, 2026.
 5. Each capture was saved as a single JSON file with a filename incorporating the UTC timestamp of
    capture completion. The files have not been modified after capture other than by file-naming. The
    contents are byte-for-byte identical to the data returned by the Apify actor.

                               III. OPERATIONAL-SILENCE OBSERVATION
 6. The May 14, 2026 Scrape Evidence establishes that no monitored X-network account has posted any
    new tweet on the X platform between May 12, 2026 and May 14, 2026. Across the full 1,000-record
    sample returned by the multi-handle query, the latest activity by any of the twelve monitored accounts is
    identified in the following table:

      Account          Last activity (UTC)
 @spuntpatrol        Sat May 09, 

Excerpt of 13269 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.

About this filing

12d Second Chain Of Custody Supplement Scrape Evidence 2026-05-14: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce), Michigan Case No. 26-104594-DO, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.

File name
12d_Second_Chain_of_Custody_Supplement_Scrape_Evidence_2026-05-14.pdf
Filed date
Case number
26-104594-DO
Category
Filed by Conrad
Disputed domains
View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
Related context
FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
Canonical record
rockenhaus.net
Direct PDF link
https://rockenhaus.net/wayne_do_26-104594-DO/filed/12d_Second_Chain_of_Custody_Supplement_Scrape_Evidence_2026-05-14.pdf