Filed by Conrad · Case 26-102221-PP
07 Motion For Issuance Of Subpoena Helgren 2026-04-24
Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).
Loading document…
Filing text (searchable excerpt)
STATE OF MICHIGAN
THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
WAYNE COUNTY
ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS,
Petitioner,
v Case No. 26-102221-PP
Hon. Yvonna C. Abraham
CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
Respondent.
_________________________________/
RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS TESTIMONY
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
COMES NOW Respondent Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, appearing pro se, and respectfully moves this Court
for an order directing the issuance of a subpoena commanding the appearance of witness Ann Helgren to
testify at the Personal Protection Order hearing scheduled for April 29, 2026, and in support thereof states:
I. NATURE OF PROCEEDING AND REQUESTED RELIEF
1. This matter involves Petitioner's request for a Personal Protection Order against Respondent, with a
hearing scheduled for April 29, 2026 at 11:30 AM via Zoom before this Honorable Court.
2. Respondent seeks issuance of a witness subpoena under MCR 2.506 compelling Ann Helgren to appear
and testify at said hearing regarding material facts within her direct knowledge.
3. This motion is made pursuant to MCR 2.506 (subpoenas for witnesses), MCR 2.305 (scope of
discovery), and the Court's inherent authority to compel witness testimony necessary for the
determination of contested facts.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
4. Ann Helgren is a material witness to events occurring on March 2, 2026, the date of Respondent's
release from federal custody.
5. Ms. Helgren has direct, first-hand knowledge of communications and instructions allegedly given by
Petitioner on March 2, 2026, including:
a. Instructions to Ms. Helgren to provide false information to law enforcement regarding Respondent's
residence;
b. Instructions to Ms. Helgren to contact the Department of Veterans Affairs with false claims regarding
Respondent's mental health status;
c. Observations of service of process by law enforcement at an incorrect address.
6. These communications and events are directly relevant to the credibility of Petitioner's claims and the
factual basis underlying the Personal Protection Order petition.
7. Ms. Helgren's testimony is necessary to establish a complete and accurate record regarding the events
of March 2, 2026, and the conduct of both parties on that date.
III. LEGAL STANDARDS AND AUTHORITY
8. Under MCR 2.506(A), a subpoena may be issued by the court to compel the attendance of witnesses at
hearings.
9. Witness testimony is properly compelled when the witness has material, relevant knowledge regarding
disputed facts in the proceeding. People v Phillips, 217 Mich App 489, 552 NW2d 487 (1996).
10. The Court has broad discretionary authority to compel witness testimony necessary for the fair
adjudication of contested proceedings. MCR 2.506; Kozel v Ostrow, 272 Mich App 168, 724 NW2d 259
(2006).
IV. GROUNDS FOR RELIEF
A. Relevance and Materiality
11. Ms. Helgren's testimony is directly relevant to central factual disputes in this proceeding, including:
a. The circumstances surrounding Respondent's release from federal custody on March 2, 2026;
b. Petitioner's conduct and communications on March 2, 2026;
c. The accuracy and reliability of Petitioner's representations to law enforcement and governmental
agencies;
d. The factual basis for Petitioner's claims regarding fear or need for protection.
B. Necessity
12. Ms. Helgren is the only witness with direct, first-hand knowledge of the specific communications and
events occurring on March 2, 2026.
13. Her testimony cannot be obtained through other means, as she is the sole witness to the relevant
communications between herself and Petitioner.
14. The testimony is necessary to establish material facts that are disputed between the
Excerpt of 6983 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.
About this filing
07 Motion For Issuance Of Subpoena Helgren 2026-04-24: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Personal Protection Order (PPO)), Michigan Case No. 26-102221-PP, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.
- File name
07_Motion_for_Issuance_of_Subpoena_Helgren_2026-04-24.pdf- Filed date
- Case number
- 26-102221-PP
- Category
- Filed by Conrad
- Disputed domains
- View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
- Related context
- FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
- Canonical record
- rockenhaus.net