Filed by Conrad · Case 26-102221-PP

11 Motion To Compel Compliance MCR 3707 2026-05-06

Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (PPO) · Wayne County Circuit Court (Third Judicial Circuit) · Filed 2026-05-06

Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).

Loading document…

Filing text (searchable excerpt)

STATE OF MICHIGAN

                IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
                    FAMILY DIVISION, PERSONAL PROTECTION ORDER DOCKET

 ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS,                                         Case No. 26-102221-PP
  Petitioner,
                                                                       Hon. PPO Docket
 v.                                                                    (Assignment Pending)

 CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
  Respondent.

 RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH MCR 3.707(A)(2) AND
   TO SCHEDULE HEARING ON PENDING MOTION TO MODIFY, EXTEND, OR
              TERMINATE PERSONAL PROTECTION ORDER

NOW COMES Respondent, Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, appearing pro se, and respectfully moves this Honorable
Court for an Order compelling compliance with Michigan Court Rule 3.707(A)(2) and scheduling a hearing on
Respondent's pending Motion to Modify, Extend, or Terminate Personal Protection Order, and in support states:

                                             I. INTRODUCTION
1. MCR 3.707(A)(2) is mandatory. It provides that "the court must schedule and hold a hearing on a motion to
   modify or terminate a personal protection order within 14 days of the filing of the motion." The rule is
   independently codified at MCL 600.2950(14) and MCL 600.2950a(14). Michigan Court of Appeals authority
   confirms the rule is mandatory and that failure to comply is reversible error. See CAJ v KDT, 339 Mich App 459;
   984 NW2d 504 (2021); JLS v HRS, ___ Mich App ___ (2024); HMM v JS, ___ Mich App ___ (2024).
2. The deadline expired forty-one (41) days ago. Respondent's Motion to Modify, Extend, or Terminate Personal
   Protection Order was filed March 12, 2026, ten (10) days after Respondent received actual notice of the ex parte
   PPO upon his release from federal custody on March 2, 2026. Filing was timely under MCR 3.707(A)(1)(b). The
   fourteen-day mandatory hearing deadline under MCR 3.707(A)(2) was March 26, 2026. The mandatory hearing
   has not been held. The merits hearing on Respondent's Motion to Terminate has never occurred.
3. The motion has now been pending for fifty-five (55) days. That period spans the recusal of the Honorable Y.C.
   Abraham and continues into the pending docket reassignment.
4. The Court retains no discretion to refuse compliance with MCR 3.707(A)(2). Respondent therefore moves this
   Honorable Court to schedule the merits hearing on the pending Motion to Modify, Extend, or Terminate Personal
   Protection Order at the earliest available date upon docket reassignment, and in any event consistent with this
   Court's mandatory obligation under MCR 3.707(A)(2).

                                    II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
5. The ex parte Personal Protection Order was entered February 20, 2026, while Respondent was incarcerated at FCI
   Milan.
6. Respondent was released from federal custody on March 2, 2026. Actual notice of the ex parte PPO was received
   that same day.
 7. On March 12, 2026, ten (10) days after actual notice, Respondent filed his Motion to Modify, Extend, or Terminate
    Personal Protection Order. Filing was timely under MCR 3.707(A)(1)(b).
 8. The mandatory hearing deadline under MCR 3.707(A)(2) expired March 26, 2026. The mandatory hearing was not
    scheduled and has not been held.
 9. Between March 12, 2026 and the present, Respondent has filed the following intervening motions and notices in
    this matter, all of which remain pending or have been incorporated into the procedural record: a Supplemental
    Motion in Support of Termination of PPO; a Motion for Court Supervised Access to Property; a Motion to Deny
    False PPO Violation Claims; a Motion for Issuance of Subpoena (Helgren); the Notice of Judicial Notice for the
    April 29 hearing; and various supporting affidavits and exhibit submissions.
10. On April 29, 2026, this Court conducted a Show Cause hearing on a separate motion filed by Petitioner. Petitio

Excerpt of 17643 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.

About this filing

11 Motion To Compel Compliance MCR 3707 2026-05-06: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Personal Protection Order (PPO)), Michigan Case No. 26-102221-PP, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.

File name
11_Motion_to_Compel_Compliance_MCR_3707_2026-05-06.pdf
Filed date
Case number
26-102221-PP
Category
Filed by Conrad
Disputed domains
View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
Related context
FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
Canonical record
rockenhaus.net
Direct PDF link
https://rockenhaus.net/wayne_ppo_26-102221-PP/filed/11_Motion_to_Compel_Compliance_MCR_3707_2026-05-06.pdf